

When reviewing payroll in Vietnam, it is easy to focus on the name of each payment: salary, allowance, supplement, or bonus.
But the label alone does not determine how a payment should be treated for compulsory social insurance purposes. Employers also need to consider the contractual terms, the nature of the payment, and the criteria set out in Vietnamese regulations.
For foreign companies operating in Vietnam, this is an important part of keeping employment contracts and payroll practices aligned.
Under Article 7 of Decree No. 158/2025/ND-CP, the monthly salary used as the basis for compulsory social insurance contributions for employees under an employer-determined salary regime includes the job or position salary, qualifying salary allowances, and certain additional amounts.
For relevant additional amounts, the rules consider whether they are specifically agreed upon in the employment contract and paid regularly and consistently in each pay period. Certain allowances and payments that depend on or fluctuate with productivity, the work process, or work quality are treated differently.
In practice, employers should review three elements together:
No single label should be treated as a shortcut for making the decision.
Consider these simplified examples:
| Compensation arrangement | What employers should review |
| A monthly supplement of VND 5 million specified in the employment contract and paid consistently | Does the payment meet the applicable criteria for inclusion in the contribution base? |
| A performance-linked payment that varies according to monthly results | How is the payment calculated, and does its nature fall within the relevant treatment under the rules? |
The difference is not simply that one payment is called a “supplement” and the other a “bonus.” Their contractual terms and actual payment arrangements need to be assessed against the applicable legal criteria.
These examples are illustrative only. The classification of an actual payment depends on the relevant facts and legal requirements.
Before finalizing payroll, employers can cross-check three sources of information.
A discrepancy does not automatically establish non-compliance. It is, however, a reason to review whether the documentation and payroll treatment accurately reflect the arrangement.
| Potential issue | Why it matters |
| A payment is described differently across records | The underlying arrangement may be unclear |
| A supposedly fixed amount varies in practice | The actual payment pattern may need further review |
| Compensation terms change but records are not updated | Payroll calculations may no longer reflect the agreed terms |
The goal is not to make every payroll item look the same. It is to ensure that each item is properly documented and assessed using the relevant rules.
In Vietnam, a payment’s name is only one part of the picture. Employers should consider the employment contract, the nature of the payment, and the applicable social insurance criteria together.
A consistent review of contracts, payroll calculations, and payment records can help foreign employers identify discrepancies before they become recurring payroll issues.
Legal reference
Article 7 of Decree No. 158/2025/ND-CP, which took effect on 1 July 2025 (vanban.chinhphu.vn).
This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The treatment of individual compensation components should be assessed against the applicable regulations and the specific facts of each case.
📌 Payroll labels not matching the paperwork?
Social insurance treatment depends on contract terms and actual payment practice — not the name of the line item. Remoly’s global employment experts can help employers align contracts, payroll records and payment evidence.
📧 contact@remoly.net · Talk to our team →
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Published: October 2026